The feminist binomial

January 11 2021 (13:05 WET)
Updated in January 11 2021 (13:05 WET)
The feminist binomial
The feminist binomial
 
 
I have been trying to write this reflection in the clearest way possible for days. I think I have finally found the words, I hope understandably.
 
There has been some controversy for some time about the evolution of feminism and the direction it should take. On the one hand, the basic theoretical feminists (who undoubtedly know De Beauvoir and company inside out and are in a position to speak knowledgeably about the movement), argue that the objectification of women and the promotion that they themselves can indirectly make of their bodies is a symptom of complicity in patriarchal education. And that anything that is objectification of female physical attributes is, ultimately, fresh food for the macho culture. 
On the other hand, the most mediatic neo-feminists, no less empowered, accentuate the discourse of the absolute freedom of their bodies to show them when and where they want. And that what fails is the patriarchal lens with which they are observed. They talk about the education of those eyes, rather than their behavior.
The truth is that both discourses are equally valid to me. 
I deeply admire and respect the theoretical feminists, to whom ALL the progress is due. But I also believe that feminism must adapt to the times and do its social work.
However, I cannot stop thinking that the exclusive objectification of women, currently, is still a symbol of object and not of subject.
The truth is that the more I document myself, the less I am able to lean towards any side, which far from making me feel disconcerted, makes me feel with a broader view. In the era of polarization, I think that more than ever, we must give space to not having a closed option ... and reflect on it and respect its evolution.
 
It is true that one is unable to imagine Simone de Beauvoir uploading a sexy semi-nude photo on Instagram. But on the other hand, historical evolution should also make feminism updated. 
Be that as it may, I am glad that what is clear is the empowerment of women to be able to act clearly, as we please.
 
On the other hand, it is worrying that Pedroche's nude photo with Filomena doing her thing in the capital goes viral; while in Cañada Real they have been with Filomena in their bones and without light for some time, and that does not arouse even a like...  
Maybe the virality of content is only a reflection of our lack of empathy and the superficiality that we historically carry. 
Be that as it may... it lacks common sense. 
 
 Amalia M. Fajardo
Most read