We have radically opposed human nature. The evolution of species has determined, in the genetic code of all human beings, sexual patterns that are frontally rejected at all levels, especially in the case of XYs who feel attraction to XXs. In other words, what has been accumulated as valid for millions of years is being criminalized in a very short period of time, which is contributing to the scourge of domestic violence persisting and worsening. The mere fact of being male and feeling desire for a woman generates a conflict, the conflict between right and wrong, between the inevitable and the avoidable, between the supposedly evolved and the damn archaic.
Thus, acclaimed and iconic artists such as Antonio Molina, Manolo Escobar, or El Fary would be censored and even denounced and persecuted today; we are talking about what was only 4 or 5 decades ago a pattern of social behavior. But in that same line, we can also talk about the groundbreaking Hombres G in 1989 and their "Sufre Mamón" or the innovative Estopa in 1999 and their "La Raja de tu Falda", who would currently be literally crushed as intolerable machists. This sociological reality that permeates everything and everyone forces the repression of male heterosexual libido, generating young men tending to disguise any manifestation of their masculinity, either behavioral or aesthetic, therefore the feminization of them is very well accepted. In the same sense, although to a lesser extent than in men, the image of the woman freed from the prevailing feminine stereotypes until recently is on the rise, so androgyny is imposed on them. After all, what it is about is eliminating phenotypic differences by denying or ignoring the genotypic fact, regardless of the consequences that may arise from it and that I basically summarize in two: the sexual homogenization of humanity under the socialist perspective that we are all equal and the, even more serious, endangering of the continuity of the human species, as long as this nonsense is not corrected to avoid its absurd drift.
Such is the omnipresent adverse conditioning that the heterosexual male endures, promoted by the disoriented progressivism, that even the legal framework and its consequent judicial action discriminates against him and, therefore, directly and indirectly forces him to renounce his genetic condition and the derived instincts that emanate from it. I am referring to the indisputable, undemocratic and unusual fact that in Spain in 2019 being a heterosexual man implies a presumption of guilt, guilt of everything that affects or refers to women. I place special emphasis on the latter and suggest that the reader reflect on this historical barbarity that bursts the Fundamental Right to the Presumption of Innocence of 50% of Spaniards. And let this example serve to demonstrate how sick Spanish society is, where what is imposed is the disappearance of both masculinity and femininity.
Having only mentioned in the first paragraph that the discredited heterosexuality contributes to domestic violence, I will delve into it in the next lines. The definition of sexual roles has blurred faster than the essential educational, cultural and social process that should have accompanied the change of model, in fact, what there has been is an overwhelming and forced paradigm shift, and those who have not digested it resort to domestic violence, always gratuitous, sad and completely absurd. There are those who integrate into their behavior, among other things for social survival strategy, the diluted role that touches; there are those who rationalize the matter and freely choose to affirm themselves in the masculine or the feminine even at the risk of being objects of rejection; and there are finally those who exploit and commit barbarities that, with this analysis, I intend to explain, although in no way justify.
Note that in this article I have limited myself to the hetero field and its gradual, but already very advanced, blurring of natural identifiers. I say this because I have not even touched on what concerns everything different from heterosexual, which also, of course, conditions and modifies sociological patterns of behavior. But with the dose of disqualifications that is already going to fall on me, despite having limited myself to what I have limited myself to, for what is reflected in this installment, it is already enough. I will address the other problems related to the so-called sexual options soon, which apparently have even dozens described, lest my critics accumulate work. And I try to take good care of my critics.
