The results of the general elections of February 1936 were manipulated so that the PSOE, together with communist and separatist political forces, would govern Spain. After that fraudulent victory, perhaps as manipulated by those abducted by George Soros as the one on April 28, a period of persecution arrived for everyone who was not aligned with the Popular Front government by the alienated who were. Leaders of the PSOE itself had the explicit objective of repealing the Spanish republican democracy and implanting a dictatorship of the proletariat, emulating what had already happened in the USSR and was managed ruthlessly by Stalin. And so the sacks and the chekas began until in July the assassination of Calvo Sotelo, leader of the right-wing party Renovación Española, which precipitated the military intervention of General Franco, whose objective was to stop all that degenerate barbarism of the left. It is necessary to remember that two years earlier, in 1934, the president of the republican government Niceto Alcalá Zamora commissioned Franco himself to defend the Second Republic from the coup d'état given by the PSOE, and the usual ones, to establish their longed-for Marxist-Leninist dictatorship, which the General did perfectly; that is, thanks to Francisco Franco, the Second Republic of 1934 continued its existence until the situation, in mid-1936, became absolutely unsustainable. Therefore, I categorically affirm that Franco avoided the imminent, at that time in October 1934, substitution of the Republic for a Bolshevik dictatorial system; and he did it again on July 18, 1936. These irrefutable historical facts produce the same effect on the current Spanish progressives as the presence of Damien Karras, with those convulsions and 360º head turns, produced on Regan MacNeil, The Exorcist. Those images were so strong, listen.
I am one of those convinced that we must look at History, the objective one, to try not to make the mistakes that were made in the past, which is an inevitable tendency in human beings, I mean making mistakes. And reviewing what the Spanish people experienced 83 years ago, I cannot avoid making a clear parallel with what we are currently experiencing in 2019. Surely there will be ignorant people who will call me exaggerated, but even they know that I am indifferent to that since I exercise my freedom of thought and expression, finding in certain media the channel for the publication of what I write. For the moment, there is still freedom in Spain in that sense. Only for the moment.
It is true that ideologically the leaders of the PSOE of the Popular Front have nothing to do with the leader of that same party in 2019. The former actively led that bastard Front, with communists and separatists being mere followers, openly and vehemently manifesting their objective of ending democracy. On the contrary, the current leader of the PSOE is a naive plagiarist without ideology who only pursues media posturing, often uses planes and helicopters paid for by all Spaniards and enjoys the day-to-day perks of his public office, at the cost of whatever it takes. The problem is that whatever it takes, which is none other than those who accompany him in his banal trajectory, unlike what happened in the middle of the third decade of the last century, as I have already pointed out.
As a whole, the actors who accompany the PSOE today are the same as those who accompanied the PSOE in that sad stage, that is, communist and Catalan and Basque separatists, with the very important nuance that the damn ideological force is held today by those who seem to be going to invest El Guapo, according to the Financial Times, because if you ask me I would say that he is a piece of monstrosity, an undoubtedly subjective impression on my part. Returning to the issue of the ideological irrelevance of the candidate for president of the Government, I reproduce some phrases from the person who is about to allow him to continue in La Moncloa: "Heaven is not taken by consensus, it is taken by assault". "A constituent process is needed to open the padlock of '78". "Power comes from the barrel of guns". "Little hands up are fine, but sometimes what works are barricades". "The enemy only understands the language of force". "You will know how to make Molotov cocktails, because in the face of the crisis of capitalism, we will have to take up arms". "To be a democrat is to expropriate". "It excites me to listen to the commander, he is greatly missed". "Podemos will not enter any government presided over by the PSOE". "The right to decide is crucial in Catalonia, the Basque Country and Galicia". "Masculine politics: with balls". "The prisoners (ETA murderers) should be leaving the prisons".
In view of Pablo Iglesias' thinking, reflected in his own sentences, my possible exaggeration with which the progressives usually denigrate me is dismantled and the threat that looms over our heads is demonstrated, which is similar to the one that flew over the heads of the inhabitants of Hiroshima when the Enola Gay entered Japanese airspace, this time I am somewhat exaggerated by the figurative sense which I try to transfer to the sociological, economic and territorial aspect of our beloved Spain. The fact is that with a puppet president captive to the chavista of the phrases, Spanish democracy is threatened by something similar to a nuclear earthquake in the style of the earthquake experienced by our ancestors in the first six months of 1936, but now in version 2.0.
