Although it may be exhausting and few people are interested or find it easy to understand, I have to do this, for my family, for my friends and for so many people who still believe in me and the political project I represent.
Firstly, all INALSA contracts and payments during the bankruptcy proceedings could only be approved and ordered by the bankruptcy administrators, but never by the political management, which had been replaced at the head of the company by court order, removing the socialist government that was then governing alone and had sunk the public company, leaving it with more than 50 million euros of debt.
They have issued eight consecutive press releases that denote the clear political intention of a completely false story from beginning to end. Neither "INALSA has paid almost a million euros" to any lawyer, nor is it "investigating anything" because it is not a court, nor has "the court discovered any costs", for the simple reason that the court imposes costs and in this case they have also been approved by them, nor can there be "misappropriation" of said costs because they were "credits in favor of the public company", because said appropriation would have been consented to not only by the court, but it would be the bankruptcy administrators themselves - responsible for ensuring said credits - who would not only be consenting, but also promoting said misappropriation to the extent that they were the ones who imposed the agreement that the bankruptcy incidents "would have no cost to INALSA or the Consortium", but in any case to the losers if they were ordered to pay costs, as they have already clarified in court (document 1).
It is equally false, in addition to impossible, that the new lawyer appointed unanimously by the INALSA Board for everything related to the bankruptcy process (document 2), charged for the common phase the work already done by the lawyer he was replacing, simply because the change occurred between 2009 and 2010, and said common phase ended in April 2012, two and a half years later. The payments to Ignacio Calatayud of 86,000 euros for the common phase and 60,000 for the agreement phase were paid by the bankruptcy administration, for the simple reason that the powers of the INALSA Board of Directors, and therefore mine, were suspended.
Finally, until the next note of course, it is false that the Consortium has directly hired the lawyer for 300,000 euros (by the way, which would be within the invented million, deceiving with the same thing in a thousand ways), because it is the same bankruptcy incident that was filed against INALSA and the Consortium, and that was logically entrusted to the same lawyer, as had been agreed unanimously by the INALSA Board of Directors on the same day that it was constituted, with the same members as the Board of Directors of the Consortium, constituted only hours before, and under the same conditions as the rest of the incidents, that is, the agreement was that in the bankruptcy incidents (whether of INALSA or the Consortium) the lawyer only accrued fees in the event that they were won with costs, fees that had to be, in addition, paid to the lawyer by the losing party, so that there was no cost to INALSA or the Consortium. If the process was lost, or won without costs, there was no cost to INALSA or the Consortium, if it was won with costs, the payment was assumed by the party ordered to pay costs. The Consortium and INALSA have paid zero euros to the lawyer for the bankruptcy incidents.
Such has been the falsehood in the official notes of the Cabildo, that they lied even when they said that the incidents were included in the first draft of the budget that I accepted and the administrators rejected, because the truth is that they never were.
Unfortunately for the island's democracy and the dignity of the institution, the PSOE has institutionalized the lie by using the Cabildo's Press Office and the Presidency's Office in a partisan way, directed by Mario Alberto Perdomo and Carlos Espino, respectively, who work for a salary at the political and exclusive service of the PSOE to distort reality, in a clear and deniable abuse of institutional power, a huge smokescreen to prevent people from talking about the real scandal of the moment, which by all accounts appears to be a very serious institutional conspiracy that to this day has not clarified who pays and why the defector councilor in the government of M.ª Dolores Corujo, Juan Manuel Sosa.
But of course, what can be expected of a president who denied up to three times, like "Saint Peter", having ever participated in the award of the water cycle to Canal gestión, when it has been proven by official certifications that she did so from beginning to end. Well, what I expect are more chapters of lies, do not doubt it, and to be able to explain all this where it really corresponds.
