The debate about social decay is usually measured under the pale prism of macroeconomic variables: inflation rates, employment charts, or fiscal balances. However, the most devastating impact of a prolonged crisis is not financial, but cognitive. When structural deficiencies are perpetuated, they operate like a silent virus that dismantles our ability to imagine that the world could be organized differently. Normalized precarity becomes a dissection of thought.
The first symptom of this entrenchment is the seizure of the future. Long-term projection requires certainty. Without it, a survival mechanism is activated that prioritizes immediate performance. When life is reduced to the anguish of making ends meet or the worry of keeping an unstable job, we fall into forced presentism.
A society trapped in daily urgency lacks the critical distance to assess where it is heading, nullifying any possibility of designing a collective horizon. In this sense, material insolvency functions as a sophisticated political sedative: it keeps the population too busy surviving to articulate dissent.
On the other hand, the dominant economic narrative insists on burying resource cuts under euphemisms of efficiency and optimization. It is an accounting mirage. The real costs of a bland system never disappear. They are simply externalized to the most vulnerable link. Thus, precarity is revealed as an invisible subsidy that the citizen grants to the system, paying for it directly with their own well-being.
Assuming this ecosystem of minimums destroys the right to excellence. When mere subsistence is erected as the only legitimate goal, quality public services, creative leisure, aesthetic dignity begin to be pointed out as dispensable ostentations. We get used to a gray and utilitarian environment because we have been inoculated with the idea that demanding something better is a selfish whim.
We live on the surface. We skate on a colossal ocean of data, blind to the internal cramp of existence. Absorbed in the stubbornness and arrogant ferocity of the everyday. We surrender to community codes that devour, shamelessly, dreams, purposes, restless impulses... Thus, we prefer to take shelter in closed spaces, sealed by the resounding oblivion of the renunciation of being.
We are faced with the generalized inability to conceive an alternative to a system that exhausts us. Breaking with the trend of precariousness consists of refusing to accept that the only function of human existence is to resist wear and tear. Let's support building a tomorrow where living is not a synonym for surviving.
Add La Voz de Lanzarote as a preferred Google source.
Stay informed with the latest current news.