Coexistence in Lanzarote has always been determined by a very particular human scale. In a geography as delimited as ours, the clash of opinions was historically resolved through tolerance and a deep respect for the roots of others. However, island public life is currently experiencing a worrying trend of scrutiny and tutelage of thought. A tendency that, under the pretext of supposed ethical superiority, penalizes disagreement, encourages self-censorship, and leads Canarian society to an evident intellectual impoverishment.
This phenomenon does not stem from a reasoned or constructive debate about the island's model (so necessary in the midst of a housing and resource management crisis), but from the urgency of certain sectors to establish themselves as the new guardians of collective morality. Any stance that does not align millimeter by millimeter with the dogmas of the moment is dismissed through personal disqualification, simplistic labeling, or public shaming, especially amplified in the digital ecosystem.
The risk of this dynamic is that the average citizen, the creator, the activist, or the professional prefers to retreat and remain silent rather than submit to the verdict of these correctness tribunals. When the fear of being singled out replaces free expression, the community loses its capacity for self-criticism.
Demographic data reflect that the island is not the closed environment it was a few decades ago. According to the latest updates from the Canary Islands Institute of Statistics (ISTAC), Lanzarote's population has consolidated an evolution that now exceeds 160,000 resident inhabitants, making our territory a profoundly heterogeneous and multicultural mosaic. From Yaiza to Órzola, social reality has become more complex.
Attempting to manage a society with this level of diversity under a single pattern of thought or a homogeneous morality is an evident sociological error. The richness of a modern and international community like ours lies in its plurality, not in the uniformity imposed by those who arrogate the right to decide which debates are acceptable and which should be silenced. Progress cannot be made if the debate on the balance between tourism, sustainability, and local well-being is stifled.
The true progress of Lanzarote will not come from mutual surveillance that suspends ideas, but from the recovery of respect for the stance of others. Democratic coexistence falters when it demands silence and thrives when it learns to listen to the uncomfortable. In the end, it is not the absence of conflict that moves us forward, but the courage to sustain dissent as the only real guarantee of our freedom.
Add La Voz de Lanzarote as a preferred Google source.
Stay informed with the latest current news.