In recent days, criticisms have been leveled by the PSOE towards my person in relation to the situation of the Amavir elderly residence. I understand that the well-being of our elderly generates concern —and it should—, but it is convenient to address this matter from responsibility, rigor and, above all, from the real knowledge of the work that is being developed.
I want to be clear: my involvement in the areas I manage is 100% and those who know me know it. It is not an empty statement or a political slogan; it is a daily reality because I am at the foot of the need, in the social trench as we usually say. I chose this position out of conviction and personal choice. I am present, attentive, and constantly working in each of the specialized services that depend on this department. That includes, of course, direct monitoring of residential centers and coordination with all involved agents.
The idea that I am "overwhelmed" by the situation has been attempted to be conveyed. Nothing could be further from the truth. I am dealing with it, yes. And it deeply concerns me, because we are talking about elderly people, families, and professionals who deserve stability, dignity, justice, and guarantees. But concern is not synonymous with being overwhelmed. To be concerned is precisely what drives one to act, to reinforce, to improve, and not to settle. We have a perfectly clear roadmap, an Inclusion strategy that integrates and gives meaning to our political action. I feel more motivated than ever in the daily help we offer to thousands of people every day and with the challenges of consolidating resources in line with the current society of Lanzarote and La Graciosa.
I am in the day-to-day of the services. I listen to the teams, analyze the data, attend to incidents, and work to ensure that solutions arrive. Not from a distance, but from the closeness and responsibility that the position demands. Public management, especially in the social sphere, does not allow for improvisation or simplistic discourse.
So no, I am not overwhelmed, what I am is completely dedicated, by my own choice, to the people and groups who most need our help and sensitivity. What I am, and I confess it, is perplexed by the continuous and insistent partisan use of such a delicate issue that demands basic ethical principles, the minimum basis expected of all of us who are public representatives
That said, I also consider it necessary to put things in context. The Socialist Party is not legitimized to give lessons on crisis management. During the past term, attention to associations was abandoned, there was a change of counselor that showed a lack of direction, and the department itself was even physically abandoned. Decisions were made such as the privatization of Las Cabreras, the relationship with fundamental entities such as Adislan deteriorated, funds were returned without executing committed projects, and the planned nursing home in Tahiche did not materialize. That is the legacy we have had to face.
I firmly defend a robust welfare system, capable of responding to current needs and anticipating future challenges. This implies investment, planning, and also collaboration. That is why I believe in co-governance as a management model: in cooperation between administrations, entities, and professionals to offer more effective and sustainable responses.
The reality of social services is complex and demands a broad perspective. It is not resolved with headlines nor with criticisms that seek political wear and tear. It is resolved with work, commitment and a will for constant improvement.
To those who today question, I invite them to add. To contribute, to collaborate and to build. Because the objective must be common: to guarantee the best possible care for our elderly.
That is, and will continue to be, my commitment