Opinion

Brother-in-law hypocrisy.

Amaral has sung with her breasts out, yes, and she has done it because of the setback that is being experienced in places where the extreme right and the PP are governing, she has done it because it is her right to free demonstration, to free expression and it is not her problem, that slimy brothers-in-law who see it as normal to see boobs on pornographic pages or through their disgusting WhatsApp groups, do not see it as normal for women to decide when, where and how to take out their breasts....

It bothers them that women are free and that they do not need the approval of any outdated gentleman from a fifth drink, that same gentleman who complains about seeing vindictive boobs is the same one who then resorts to the Internet or even worse, to brothels.

Do they say anything to you, José Luis (name to refer to the typical brother-in-law) for going with your breasts bare on the beach or walking down the street? I am sure they will never say it to you, nor to me.

It even makes me laugh at the absurd excuses of the detractors, the same ones who surely laughed when Sabrina's breasts came out on television and even made songs.

Do you know why it is shocking to see female breasts in public? Because of the education based on the most rancid machismo.

If instead of Amaral it had been Maluma, Kelvin Roldan or J. Balvin there would be no controversy, because in the case of guys it is seen as "normal" and even exemplary. Even though there are some obese men who have more breasts than many women, but you will never hear anyone criminalize, criticize or force them to cover up.

I say it loud and clear, bravo for Amaral! For defending the freedom of expression of artists and the right of women.

And do me a favor! More Amarals and less Vaquerizos.