Politics

The PP denounces the "sectarianism" of the Tías government for preventing a motion against pardons from being debated in plenary

They criticize the incoherence that in the Plenary Sessions it is possible to talk about the difficulties in the Sahara, in Venezuela or Colombia but not about the respect for our Constitution and the Rule of Law

The PP councilors of Tías, in the plenary session

The Popular Group in the Tías Town Hall criticizes the sectarianism with which the Psoe, Lava and Podemos Government, headed by José Juan Cruz, acts, by preventing the inclusion in the agenda of the next municipal plenary session of a motion in which, among other agreements, the Government of Spain is urged to respect the independence of the different State institutions, judicial decisions, and not to grant pardons to those who have violated - as declared by the Supreme Court - not only our Constitution but also other Spanish laws.

Proposal that is complemented by showing the support of the institution, the Tías Town Hall, to the Constitution as guarantors of the unity of the nation and supporting the work carried out every day by the different Spanish courts. "All issues on which the Psoe, Lava and Podemos government prevent debate as if the fact of being 2000 kilometers from the peninsula this problem was not with the neighbors, in this case, of the municipality of Tías," denounces Saray Rodríguez, spokesperson for the Popular Party in the consistory.

"It is totally incongruous that a government that calls itself progressive restricts the political debate that it boasts so much, and prevents the consistory from pronouncing on the pardons that Sánchez plans to grant to those convicted of sedition, for the illegal proclamation of an independent Catalan republic, when it is an issue that affects all Spaniards."

For the PP councilor, "it cannot be that the same standard is not applied to all the initiatives that are taken to the plenary session, regardless of the party that presents them."

In the plenary sessions we have debated without problem the national health system, the labor reform or the difficult situation in the Sahara, Venezuela or Colombia, to give some examples." "Motions and even institutional declarations have been approved in this regard, but now it turns out that the respect for our Constitution and the Rule of Law cannot be debated or any pronouncement made," denounces Rodríguez.

The Populars assure that with the government's refusal there is "a strong comparative grievance that violates the principle of political legality of the institution; a fundamental value of the legal system. Apart from the fact that it throws away the supposed talent and healthy political debate that should prevail and that the government of Tías, supposedly progressive, proclaims so much."